Aerial night view of Spanish and Portuguese cities during a massive blackout in April 2025, with only scattered lights visible across darkened urban areas and surrounding landscapes

Spain Trails Europe in Grid Reform as Blackout Exposes Risks

When Spain plunged into darkness during its worst blackout in decades, the outage was more than a fleeting power failure—it was a wake-up call. The sudden collapse exposed a power grid straining to keep pace with one of Europe’s most aggressive renewable rollouts, revealing how years of capped investment, slow permitting, and outdated rules have left critical infrastructure vulnerable. As the country races toward ambitious climate targets, the blackout sharpened the question of whether Spain can modernize its grid fast enough to turn abundant wind and solar into reliable, round-the-clock power.

September 24, 2025
Colin Tang
14 Mins Read

Spain’s worst blackout in decades has exposed fragilities in its electricity grid, intensifying pressure on the government to accelerate investment as the country leans heavily on renewables.

In April 2025, tens of millions lost power for hours after a cascading failure cut electricity across the Iberian Peninsula. The outage halted trains, disrupted telecoms, and forced hospitals onto backup systems. The incident underscored risks in a grid increasingly reliant on wind and solar, which now generate more than half of Spain’s electricity, according to Red Eléctrica (Graph 1).

Graph 1: Structure of Electricity Generation in 2024 in Spain

Structure of Electricity Generation in 2024 in Spain
Source: Red Eléctrica

Originally designed around predictable baseload generation, the system has struggled to adapt to the variability of renewable supply. Grid expansion has lagged capacity growth, creating bottlenecks that complicate balancing and storage.

Policy Response and Market Reaction

The Spanish government unveiled a package of measures aimed at reinforcing grid reliability and accelerating modernization. Details include stronger regulatory oversight, faster integration of renewables and storage, upgraded infrastructure, and increased investment to boost grid resilience. Still, investors argue that without regulatory overhaul and clearer long-term incentives, capital will be slow to flow.

Kristina Ruby, Secretary General at Eurelectric, Europe’s electricity industry association, said: "The blackout was a wake-up call. It showed that the need to modernise and reinforce Europe’s electricity grid is urgent and unavoidable."

Europe-Wide Push

Spain’s grid challenge is emblematic of a wider European struggle. As member states expand renewables to meet climate targets, the European Union (EU) is pushing for greater coordination, resilience, and system flexibility. Interconnection projects, digitalized grids, and demand-response mechanisms are rising priorities across the bloc.

For Spain, the April outage sharpened debate over how fast it can build the infrastructure to support its energy transition. The country must reassure markets that its power system can handle volatility while avoiding future shocks that undermine investor confidence.

Spain’s Grid Ambitions and Investment Gap

Spain aims to generate 81% of its electricity from renewables by 2030, a target that would outpace both European and global averages under its National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan (Graph 2). The strategy depends on accelerating wind and solar deployment to drive decarbonization of the power sector.

Graph 2: Share of Power Generation from Renewables

Share of Power Generation from Renewables
Source: Rystad Energy

Execution risks remain high. Analysts warn that permitting delays and administrative hurdles are slowing momentum. Spain has the highest ratio in Western Europe of late-stage renewable projects in grid connection queues to installed capacity, at 170%, according to the International Energy Agency and Morningstar (Graph 3).

Graph 3: Renewables Capacity in Connection Queue

Renewables Capacity in Connection Queue
Source: IEA, Morningstar

The backlog reflects years of underinvestment and restrictive regulation. Policymakers have capped grid spending and tightly controlled returns, creating a framework that critics say no longer fits a system shifting rapidly toward variable generation. Without faster permitting and regulatory reform, Spain risks missing its targets despite strong wind and solar potential.

Outdated Spending Caps

Spain still limits annual spending on electricity networks under caps that have remained unchanged for years, despite the rapid expansion of renewables. Transmission investment is capped at 0.065% of GDP and distribution at 0.13%. Companies that exceed their allocation face reduced remuneration and even tighter limits the following year. The rules have discouraged forward-looking investment and left the grid struggling to keep pace with new projects.

The gap with European targets is stark. Eurelectric estimates the EU will need €67 billion a year for network upgrades and digitalization from 2025 to 2050, around 0.4% of EU GDP. That is several times Spain’s permitted levels.

Spain now has one of the lowest ratios of grid to renewable investment in Europe, according to Bloomberg. During the past five years, the country invested an average of 30 cents for every $1 spent on renewables. This compares to an average of 70 cents in most European markets (Graph 4). The imbalance highlights the strain on efforts to connect fresh renewable capacity and underlines how far the country must move to align grid spending with its transition goals.

Graph 4: Grid to Renewable Energy Investment Ratio for Selected European Markets

Grid to Renewable Energy Investment Ratio for Selected European Markets
Source: BloombergNEF

Spain’s restrictive spending framework is compounded by limits on regulated returns, further discouraging the capital needed to modernize the grid.

Low Regulated Returns Curb Grid Investment

Spain’s regulator sets the nominal pre-tax return on electricity grid assets at 5.58% under a weighted average cost of capital framework, a level widely seen as uncompetitive. By comparison, US state regulators have authorized average utility returns on equity above 9% over the past decade (Graph 5). Even adjusting for methodological differences, Spain’s regime is comparatively more restrictive, raising concerns that investment will shift to markets with higher returns.

Graph 5: U.S. Electric Utilities Return on Equity Authorizations

U.S. Electric Utilities Return on Equity Authorizations
Source:  J.Pollock

The National Commission on Markets and Competition plans to raise the rate to 6.46% from 2026. Industry leaders argue that is too modest to attract the scale of capital needed.

Marta Castro, head of regulation at Aelec, a Spanish utilities lobby group, has called for a rate closer to 7.5% to match peers. She warned Spain risks capital flight to other EU markets if returns remain low.

Endesa Chief Executive José Bogas voiced similar concerns after the April blackout. He said the framework falls short of what is required to build a robust grid and urged policymakers to improve remuneration of investments in power grids.

Iberdrola, a global leader in grids, storage and clean energy, underscored the issue in July 2025 when it raised €5 billion in an oversubscribed share sale. The company said most of the funds will go to US and UK networks, where regulation offers higher and more stable returns. Chairman Ignacio Galan said Spain’s proposed increase to 6.46% still sends “a clearly negative signal” to investors.

The industry pushback highlights that regulated returns remain a critical bottleneck. Without more competitive incentives, Spain risks missing its energy transition targets as capital flows abroad.

Those limits on spending and returns are not just deterring investment; they are driving real losses in renewable output.

The Cost of Inaction

Spain’s grid shortfall is already weighing on the energy transition. Underinvestment is slowing new project rollouts and forcing renewable plants offline when transmission lines cannot absorb output. Curtailments of wind and solar are becoming more frequent, wasting cheap power that could otherwise ease prices and reduce emissions.

In July 2025, Spain curtailed 11% of renewable generation due to grid constraints, according to Red Eléctrica. That compares with an average of 2% to 3% over the past year and marks the highest monthly loss ever recorded (Graph 6).

Graph 6: Renewable Curtailment in the Peninsular System Due to Technical Constraints in the Grid

Renewable Curtailment in the Peninsular System Due to Technical Constraints in the Grid
Source: Red Eléctrica

Analysts warn the country risks being locked into a cycle of slow permitting, outdated spending caps, and low regulated returns. The mix diverts capital abroad and makes Spain’s 2030 climate goals harder to reach.

Other European markets show a different path. Countries with clearer incentives and more adaptive regulatory regimes have accelerated grid investment, enabling faster integration of renewables and low-carbon technologies (LCTs).

Lessons from Abroad

Spain’s grid challenges mirror those across Europe, but several countries have adopted targeted measures to ease bottlenecks. Germany’s Section 14a sets rules for managing flexible loads to reduce congestion. The UK’s G100 standard streamlines conditions for distributed energy projects, allowing faster connections and expanded capacity. Poland has introduced an opt-in model that lets consumers and producers connect earlier under transparent terms, creating clearer investment signals.

These examples highlight how regulatory clarity and adaptive frameworks can unlock capital, strengthen system reliability, and accelerate renewable integration.

Germany’s Section 14a

Germany has introduced binding rules to unlock grid flexibility through Section 14a of its Energy Industry Act, in force since January 2024. The regulation requires new residential devices with a grid connection above 4.2 kilowatts, including heat pumps, EV chargers, batteries and air conditioners, to be controllable by distribution operators. Utilities can temporarily throttle these loads during peak stress while guaranteeing users a minimum level of service.

The measure reflects the shift toward managing local networks more dynamically. About 60% of Europe’s power system runs on low-voltage lines (Graph 7), where rising electrification risks congestion. Section 14a gives operators a tool to prevent overloads and stabilize supply while allowing households to connect new technologies more quickly.

Graph 7: Share of Voltage Lines in Europe

Share of Voltage Lines in Europe
Source: Eurelectric

The benefits extend beyond resilience. By unlocking additional grid capacity at the low-voltage, the rule accelerates adoption of LCTs and reduces delays tied to rigid capacity planning. It marks a shift to a “connect now, manage dynamically” model.

Spain lacks a comparable mandate. Without household-level flexibility, distribution networks risk deeper congestion as electrification accelerates.

The United Kingdom’s G100

The UK has adopted Engineering Recommendation G100, a technical standard issued by the Energy Networks Association that underpins Customer Limitation Schemes (CLS). These schemes let households and businesses install generation or demand capacity without waiting for costly network reinforcement. Power flows at the connection point are monitored in real time, and generation or demand is automatically curtailed to keep imports and exports within agreed limits.

The approach has had two key effects. It has unlocked additional grid capacity by replacing a reinforce-first model with dynamic constraint management. It has also provided clearer signals for investors. By embedding certainty into connection standards, G100 reduces delays and improves project bankability.

G100 illustrates how technical flexibility and regulatory clarity can expand access at the distribution level. In Spain, defined standards of this kind could accelerate the rollout of rooftop solar, batteries, heat pumps and EV chargers by letting smaller projects connect more quickly. Automated curtailment within set thresholds would also give operators a tool to manage congestion without waiting for reinforcement, easing delays that often discourage households and community investors.

Both Germany and the UK show that clear, flexible standards can expand grid access, reduce delays and give investors greater confidence in project delivery.

Poland’s Opt-In Connection Model

Poland is advancing its most significant grid connection reform in more than a decade. A March 2025 proposal to amend the Energy Law would allow distribution and transmission operators to offer flexible connection agreements in congested areas. Developers could connect earlier under these terms, but operators would be permitted to curtail output or demand temporarily without compensation until upgrades are completed.

Supporters see the move as a pragmatic way to shorten long queues that have slowed Poland’s renewable rollout. Early connection under constrained conditions would let projects start generating revenue sooner, while accelerating deployment of solar and onshore wind.

Poland’s proposal underscores the value of giving developers transparent choices. In Spain, earlier connections under clear rules, with a defined path to full access after reinforcement, could help ease the backlog and send stronger investment signals. While not a substitute for greater grid spending, such flexibility would better align renewable growth with the realities of system constraints.

Final Words

Spain’s April 2025 blackout exposed structural weaknesses in a grid that has lagged behind one of Europe’s fastest renewable buildouts. Years of capped spending, low regulated returns and slow permitting have produced one of the region’s largest connection backlogs, with rising curtailments already cutting into the value of clean power. Unless addressed, these constraints risk derailing Spain’s 2030 climate goals and diverting capital to markets with clearer incentives.

Other European countries show that regulatory innovation can relieve pressure even before new infrastructure is built. Germany’s Section 14a has eased local stress through demand-side flexibility. The UK’s G100 has reduced delays by embedding certainty into connection standards. Poland’s proposal for flexible agreements offers developers earlier access under transparent terms while upgrades catch up.

The lesson for Spain is not to copy any single model but to adapt regulation as fast as the energy system itself evolves. Without deeper reform, the gap between surging renewable supply and sluggish grid expansion will widen, leaving the country more exposed to reliability risks and missed targets.

The blackout was a warning shot: without swift regulatory reform, Spain’s energy transition risks stalling before it reaches scale.

About The Author

Colin Tang is the Senior Investment Officer at Corinex, where he leverages his extensive experience in finance to drive the company's investment strategy and portfolio performance. With a proven track record of identifying and capitalizing on investment opportunities, Colin plays a crucial role in supporting Corinex's financial objectives and growth.

Contact us to request access to the data and analytics mentioned in our article, or discover how Corinex solutions enable grid digitalization and address grid constraints.

Talk to us

Discover more insights on energy industry

Link to article

AI Is Fueling a Data Center Electricity Surge But the Grid Isn’t Ready

June 2, 2025
Link to article

Closing the Infrastructure Divide for Decarbonization

March 11, 2025
Link to article

Italy's Superbonus Boosted Growth but Strained the Grid

October 15, 2024